The House of Representatives has ordered a “detailed” public
hearing on the activities of the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria,
particularly the Council’s decision to fix the tenure of the leadership of
religious organisations. The House passed the resolution on Wednesday in Abuja at a
session which was presided over
by the Speaker, Mr. Yakubu Dogara.
by the Speaker, Mr. Yakubu Dogara.
It came after members debated and endorsed a motion moved by
the Minority Leader of the House, Mr. Leo Ogor.
Lawmakers also clarified that no agency of the Federal
Government was empowered by any law passed by the National Assembly to
determine how many years a religious leader should serve in office.
They noted that the FRC Act 2011 did not make provision for
the tenure of office of religious bodies or non-profit organisations.
While leading the debate, Ogor said he was amazed where the
FRC got its powers.
He added that while the agency might have delegated
legislative powers, being a product of the National Assembly, any legislation
or code it formulated should have been mandatorily approved by the same
National Assembly before it could be applied.
In the extant case of the controversial Good Governance Code
formulated by the FRC for non-profit organisations, the lawmaker stated that
the National Assembly had no knowledge of it.
The motion stated, “The House is concerned that the
Governance Code, formulated by the Council, as it relates to heads of
non-profit making organisations, is a clear usurpation of the powers of the
National Assembly as stipulated in Section 4 of the Constitution of the Federal
Republic of Nigeria, 1999.
“Also concerned that the National Assembly has not, in any
way, approved the corporate governance code as it did with the Building Code.
“The House is convinced that codes of corporate governance
must be in conformity with international best practices.
“Worried that an overzealous chief executive officer of a
regulatory body can misinterpret or
misapply the provisions of the code as can be clearly seen in the case of the
FRC.”
In performing its duties, Ogor pointed out that the FRC was
to restrict itself to accountability, transparency and probity in pursuing
corporate governance principles in public and private organisations.
“No law, enacted by the National Assembly, empowers any
agency to set the tenure of office for heads of non-profit organisations,” he
added.
The Chairman, House Committee on Ethics/Privileges, Mr.
Nicholas Ossai, took the same position as Ogor.
He told the House that though the FRC was empowered to
function, the issue of fixing how long a religious leader should be in office
was off its bounds.
Ossai added, “This is because we are talking about the
things of God here.
“The tenure of religious leaders is determined by God, not
man.
“Besides, delegated legislation like the FRC code should
have been forwarded to the National Assembly for approval.
“The code in question was never forwarded to the National
Assembly.”
Report credit: Punch
Report credit: Punch
No comments:
Post a Comment